Dell PowerStore 3200T vs 5200T
Dell PowerStore 3200T
Dell PowerStore 5200T
The PowerStore 3200T and 5200T sit next to each other in Dell's PowerStore Gen2 all-flash, NVMe-native lineup. Both are 2U dual-node appliances running the same PowerStoreOS, with the same data-reduction engine, the same scale-out clustering, and the same set of supported NVMe TLC SSDs. The difference between them is horsepower, not feature set: the 5200T carries more CPU cores, more DRAM, and a larger NVRAM write cache, which translates into higher sustained throughput and headroom under heavy mixed workloads. The 3200T is the volume midrange model; the 5200T is the step-up for denser consolidation and more demanding performance tiers. For most buyers the decision comes down to how much performance headroom you need today and over the life of the array, since both share the same maximum drive count and the same software capabilities. The notes below are drawn from Dell's published Gen2 specifications and are kept general where exact figures vary by configuration.
Side by side
| Dell PowerStore 3200T | Dell PowerStore 5200T | |
|---|---|---|
| Positioning | Volume midrange of the PowerStore Gen2 line; strong price/performance for general consolidation | Step-up midrange model; more headroom for performance-intensive and denser mixed workloads |
| Form factor and architecture | 2U, dual active/active controller nodes, NVMe-native end to end | 2U, dual active/active controller nodes, NVMe-native end to end (same architecture) |
| CPU | Lower per-node core count (roughly 64 cores total across the appliance) | Higher per-node core count (roughly 96 cores total across the appliance) |
| System memory | Less DRAM per appliance (on the order of 768 GB) | More DRAM per appliance (on the order of 1,152 GB) for larger working sets |
| Write cache (NVRAM) | Smaller NVRAM write buffer (two NVMe NVRAM modules) | Larger NVRAM write buffer (four NVMe NVRAM modules) to absorb heavier write bursts |
| Max drives and capacity | Up to ~93 NVMe drives per appliance; large effective capacity with data reduction | Up to ~93 NVMe drives per appliance; same maximum drive count and capacity ceiling |
| Software and data services | Full PowerStoreOS: inline dedupe/compression, snapshots, replication, thin provisioning, AppsON | Identical PowerStoreOS feature set; no software-tier differences vs the 3200T |
| Scale-out | Clusters with other PowerStore appliances; up to a multi-appliance federated cluster | Same clustering model; mixes with other PowerStore Gen2 appliances in one cluster |
Shop these now
Live configurations from our catalog with partner pricing. Add to your cart to request a firm quote, or build a full BOM.
Dell PowerStore 3200T
Dell PowerStore 5200T
Choose the 3200T when budget and fit matter most
The 3200T is the better-value choice for general-purpose virtualization, databases, and file/block consolidation where you don't expect to constantly saturate the controllers. You get the full PowerStoreOS feature set, the same maximum drive count, the same data-reduction guarantee program, and the same scale-out story as the 5200T, at a lower entry cost. If your workload is steady rather than spiky, or you plan to scale out by adding appliances rather than maxing a single one, the 3200T delivers the platform's benefits without paying for headroom you won't use. It's also a sensible building block for an edge or departmental site that may later join a larger PowerStore cluster.
Choose the 5200T when you need performance headroom
The 5200T is the pick when a single appliance has to do more: higher transaction rates, larger active datasets, write-heavy or bursty I/O, or aggressive consolidation of many workloads onto one system. Its additional CPU cores, larger DRAM, and doubled NVRAM write cache give it more sustained throughput and more room before you'd need to add nodes. If you're standardizing on one model across a fleet and want to minimize the chance of a controller becoming the bottleneck over a 3-to-5-year life, the 5200T buys insurance. It's also the safer choice for latency-sensitive tiers where you want margin during peaks and rebuilds.
These are the same platform tuned to two power levels, so neither is 'better' in the abstract. Pick the 3200T for best price/performance on steady, general-purpose workloads, and step up to the 5200T when you need more controller headroom for heavier, bursty, or densely consolidated workloads on a single appliance. Because both run identical PowerStoreOS software, share the same ~93-drive ceiling, and cluster together, you can also start with 3200Ts and add a 5200T (or more nodes) later without re-platforming. As a Dell reseller, Uniqcli can size the controller model against your real IOPS, latency targets, and growth plans, and quote the matching drive mix and support tier.
Talk to a specialistFrequently asked
What's the core difference between the PowerStore 3200T and 5200T?
They run the same Gen2 platform and software; the 5200T simply has more compute. It carries more CPU cores, more system DRAM, and a larger NVRAM write cache than the 3200T, which gives it more sustained throughput and headroom under heavy or bursty workloads. Capacity ceilings, drive support, and data services are the same.
Do the 3200T and 5200T have different storage features?
No. Both run the same PowerStoreOS with identical data services: inline deduplication and compression, snapshots, thin provisioning, native and metro replication, and AppsON. There is no software tier difference, so you're choosing on performance and price, not on capabilities.
Can I mix a 3200T and a 5200T in the same cluster?
Yes. PowerStore Gen2 appliances cluster together in a single federated system, so you can combine 3200T and 5200T appliances and manage them as one. That makes it practical to start with the model that fits today and add a different model later as your performance or capacity needs grow, without re-platforming.
Build your Dell bill of materials.
Send us the requirement, the project, or an existing quote to beat. We come back with a validated, TAA-compliant Dell configuration and a real price, often below list.
[email protected] · Chicago, IL